Talk:Social movement

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Social movement article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Philosophy: Social and political Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology: Social Movements High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the social movements task force.

Two major sections missing

I was just looking at the article and I realized we are missing two big sections: 1) on what issues social movements are concerned with (gender rights, human rights, environment, etc.) and 2) on geographical distribution of social movements (how many are located in which part of the world). I will try to expand on this in the future; if you have any sources/data do list them here (or add them to the article). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 15:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Defining which issues social movements are concerned with

Some examples of classic social movements would be useful (e.g. the Civil Rights movement). But any section written to define social movements should not be too narrowly defined, because the internet has greatly expanded the range of topics available to protest. See, e.g., Earl, J., & Schussman, A. (2008). Contesting cultural control: Youth culture and online petitioning. (In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (Vol. c, pp. 71–96). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.) and the rise of Change.org and other petition sites that regularly adopt non-state actors as targets. Civicked (talk) 17:47, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2. Geographic distribution:

Note - a very useful source is the research by Jackie Smith:

Jackie Smith, Charles Chatfield, Ron Pagnucco (1997). "Transnational social movements and global politics". Syracuse University Press
Jackie Smith (1997). Characteristics of the Modern Transnational Social Movement Sector, pp.42-58 in Transnational Social Movements and World Politics: Solidarity beyond the State (ed. J. Smith, C. Chttfield and R. Pagnucco). Syracuse University Press
Jackie Smith, Hank Johnston (2002), Globalization and resistance:transnational dimensions of social movements, Rowman & Littlefield
Jackie Smith, Dawn West (2005) The Uneven Geography of Global Civil Society: National and Global Influences on Transnational Association. Social Forces, Volume 84, Issue 2

She focuses on trans(inter)national movements, findings conclude that those are dominated in the developed/core/North/West, goals (human rights (27%), environment (14%), woman’s rights (10%), peace (9%), world-order/multi-issue (9%), development (5%) and self-determination/ethics (5%)) and age (mean is 20-something years). I'll try to add that to the article; if I forget to do it soon ping me or use the above sources. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 15:39, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Lowland ([1]) offers an interesting estimate on the big picture of social movements with regards to size. "Taking all SMOs as a set and extrapolating from the limited data we have [...] I venture the guess that the vast majority of SMOs in at least the industrialized democracies have well less then 50 members, with many having twenty-five members or less. Only a small percentage have membership of more then ten thousands, although [a small number] have been much larger. [...] Focusing on the end of major periods of mobilization” numbers in the range of hundreds of thousands and even millions have been reported. Again, I'll try to expand on it. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 15:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Porn — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.88.23.33 (talk) 17:00, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Movement theory section

Hey all. It seems like Social_movement#Social_movement_theories is a little sparse with the citations and maybe leans too heavily on bullet points when paragraphs would be sufficient (see:Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lists#Bulleted_and_numbered_lists) . Some of the material may be better covered in the existing Social Movement Theory entry, which is shorter in several spots than the social movement theory subsection on this page. If anyone has additional citations please add them. I'll put in cites for the material I can track down, and adding some "citation needed" tags elsewhere.69.138.253.89 (talk) 16:49, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, we have duplicate content here WP:CFORK in the Social Movement Theories Section with the better presented Social Movement Theory article. Perhaps we should just have an introductory paragraph here and a link to the other article. Carl94965 (talk) 19:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History Section

There is also a problem with the history section. WP:NOTEVERYTHING This is basically a description of the development of social movements in England. The American, French and Russian revolutions surely were driven by social movements and had a significant impact, but these are only mentioned in passing. This section should be cut out to form a separate article, "History of Social Movements in England". Carl94965 (talk) 19:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

General Improvements

History - As previously suggested, the current history section here should really be completely revised. It is too Eurocentric and only refers to about 2-3 centuries. The first sentence is almost surely wrong if we take the definition of social movements at the top of the page: Group action oriented towards social and political change, essentially. It is super unlikely, as per common sense, that this kind of action originated in England in the mid-1700s. Social movements occur all over the world. Also, I would think the history of social movements would be the centerpiece of such an article, as they change and define the scope and change-power social movements are understood to possess.Sev-r-eyed (talk) 18:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

General Suggestions

For a mediated life class we were required to select an article and evaluate it. After doing so we were asked to make suggestions that would help turn it into an article of good status. Here are our following suggestions. Keep article up to date by removing information that is no longer relevant. There are also a few hyperlinks on the page that no longer go to the page they are supposed to, they should be removed. Secondly, there are many statements that say "citation needed" an appropriate citation should be found and added for those items. Hullihan 24 (talk) 16:05, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent social movements listed are from 2013. With all of the social movements going on today (Women’s March, Climate Change, etc.), there is plenty of room to add more modern movements

In relation to being more modern, the page only talks briefly about the roles of social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter. Some modern movements have entire Twitter pages dedicated specifically to them, so I think they should elaborate more on the role social media.

“The sociological study of social movements is quite new.” While it is new, maybe throw in what some studies have found about social movements.

Gittisd (talk) 21:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Social movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Importance of the social movements

Importance of the social movements should be added

Abhinav abcde (talk) 08:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Improvement

After reading this article I felt that talking more about how social media influences social movements would be a good idea. With social media being a huge influencer on young teens I felt that laying out this connection can bring a more modern spin on the topic. The article seems to be quite balanced but I believe talking about the impact of social media when it comes to bringing social movements together can add an element of relatability. An appropriate spot to put this information may be under the Mass mobilization section because social media allows many people with similar ideas to connect. Brusso7 (talk) 21:33, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Bradley Russo[reply]

community movement aka social movement

Should this be called a social movement or a community movement to preserve the word social to refer to having close and personal relationships and social meaning friends in a more general sense? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.175.63 (talk) 04:42, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Potential COI Declaration

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Communitarian703 (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

Hi again @Communitarian703! You've added a {{Connected contributor}} tag for yourself to this page, Talk:Populism, and Talk:Patriotism now, and I just wanted to ask what you're declaring a COI with? This template, as far as I'm aware, is for declaring a connection with the subject of the article, and I'm not sure how you can have a COI with the topic "social movement"? In the template code you've said This user is an employee of the Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies, in which case - as this organisation doesn't have a Wikipedia article (which I can find), I would suggest you use the {{UserboxCOI}} template on your userpage instead - and then, when you make an edit to a page such as this one, if your edit is related to your employer/organisation or person you know, you note that in your edit summary. Also, if you're being paid by the Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies, and you haven't done so yet, it is highly advisable that you read WP:PAID. Thanks ! Seagull123 Φ 14:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for these tips, @Seagull123!

Merge social movements and reform movements

Hey. I get the theoretical difference but both articles cover essentially the same topics now. I would suggest merging reform movements into this? And also merge the categories. Reform movements is essentially a list of social movements by country and time which could go into Category:19th-century social movements and Category:Social movements by country. Hobbyvoll (talk) 20:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]